|
Ouch? No!! Try: Pain Prevention!
Be sure to allow the viewing of blocked
(safe) content on this page before scrolling away. You might like to be in
touch about what is here.
This page was released into Cyberspace on Tuesday, June 20,
2006 at 5:10pm MST and was last updated on November 17, 2009
.
If you are experiencing discomfort,
pain or a confirmed injury as a result of playing
hammered dulcimer or autoharp (or another instrument) and are coming here for
more information, or if you just want to be sure music-related injury
never becomes part of your life, or you're a therapist looking for ways to help
an injured patient: Welcome!
Bear in mind that I am not a doctor,
but a classically trained musician who has been studying dulcimer- and autoharp-related injuries
since 1985 in order to provide
information, encouragement and hope to those in need of
healing.[1] While it's certainly possible to heal yourself by
revising the "how" of your habits, it is always wise to consult a medical professional knowledgeable
in Repetitive Strain Injury (RSI), Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) and related upper-body conditions
should you have any doubt, or if your symptoms don't go away. (Remember: These conditions are not in your head,
and are not necessarily induced by hereditary.) Music-related injuries do not have to be
permanent,
debilitating conditions, and most of the time players can heal themselves
through observing the habits behind them and then embarking on retraining. And when healthy habits take over, tone and musicality both improve!
If you are a doctor, therapist,
dulcimer/autoharp teacher or an injured dulcimer player/autoharpist/musician in need of more support beyond what follows
(which is just
scratching the surface), allow pop-ups on this page if you have to, then feel free to
. I invite you to visit here often; this page is updated as more
information becomes available.
Note: Much of
the dulcimer information here was presented at the 24th Annual Symposium of the
Performing Arts Medicine Association on June 24, 2006,
and enthusiastically received by doctors, therapists and arts professionals
alike.
Endorsements
I had the
privilege to attend the presentation given by Lucille Reilly,
titled “Beyond
Diagnosis: Retraining the Hammered Dulcimer Player,” at the 24th
Annual Symposium on Medical Problems of Musicians and Dancers in Aspen, Colorado
June 22-25, 2006 . I was extremely impressed with Ms. Reilly’s analysis
of the biomechanics, anatomy, and alignment that is necessary for the dulcimer
player to safely and effectively play the instrument. She demonstrated
beautifully what happens to the trunk, and the upper and lower extremities, if
both the instrument and the player’s body are not properly positioned.
Her understanding of what is necessary, both from the anatomical and
ergonomic perspectives as they relate to the playing of this instrument, is
outstanding.
--Michelina C. Cassella, PT; Director, Department of Physical Therapy and
Occupational Therapy Services, Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts USA
Lucille’s conclusions are consistent with my long-term
personal study of soft-tissue and neural-muscular injury (I suffered serious
non-music-related accidents in 1990 and 1998). Her insights and discernment
have boosted my
musicality on hammered dulcimer, brought me greater expressive freedom with the dulcimer and other instruments, and aided my general recovery as well.
–Scott Reeder, hammered dulcimer player, “Music for All Seasons”, New Mexico
USA
Thanks,
Lucille. This is good stuff.
--Kathy Durant,
dulcimer player/teacher, Maryland USA
General Questions
I've heard that feeling some pain when practicing
is a good thing. Isn't pain a sign that I am improving?
Will drugs heal a music-related injury?
What about stretching exercises, massage,
acupuncture?
What about surgery?
What's involved in retraining?
Have you ever needed
retraining from injury?
Where can I get more information on RSI and retraining?
Hammered Dulcimer Questions
What are the likely causes and effects of hammered dulcimer-related injuries?
What are some tangible
things a hammered dulcimer player can do to play freely?
What is the best height and tilt for my dulcimer?
How can I check for smooth movements in my
hammering?
I have been told to play with my wrists. Is this
okay?
How do I know when my wrists
are in neutral?
Is it better to stand or sit when playing?
Should I wear wrist splints while
playing the dulcimer to avoid bending my wrists to strike the strings?
I've been holding my hammers "out of
whack", according to this page, for a long time, and I don't feel any pain.
What's so bad about the "pinch grip"? It seems like every player
I know is using it!
I have arthritis in the joints of my
fingers. Should I still attempt these neutral principles of holding the
hammers and striking the strings as you advise, or am I on my
own?
Autoharp Questions
What are the likely causes and effects of
autoharp-related injuries?
What are some tangible things I can do to avoid
injury when playing the autoharp?
Is it better to stand or sit when playing?
What's the best placement of the hip pouch when
setting up to play?
It sounds like neutral wrists are essential. How
do I find neutral wrists?
I've been taught to strum by not pushing my thumb across the strings
with my arm, because it's said that will hurt me. What do you have to say
about this?
General Questions
I've heard that feeling some pain when practicing is a good thing.
Isn't pain a sign that I am improving?
No. If you think you have to
hurt, even a little, in order to make progress, think again. Pain means
there's a problem with how you're playing (biomechanics) or the instrument's physical
set-up in relation to your body (ergonomics) or both. If you can't
troubleshoot what you are doing to identify the source of the pain, get a consultation from
a medical professional. After this, I would seek out a musician who understands the
importance of retraining to reverse these kinds of injuries (better yet if that
person is a dulcimer or an autoharp player). Some retraining resources
include a certified Alexander Technique teacher,
and the organization I am training with, Andover
Educators.
When you experience pain while
playing, your sixth sense, kinesthesia or the feel of playing, is talking to you--except
that's not the kind of talk you want. When the movement you use in playing
feels spacious, buoyant, free and without pain, your kinesthesia tells
you that all is well. And when it does, listen to your instrument! You'll most likely
hear it sing and resonate in wonderful ways that it wasn't allowed to do up to
this point!
Note: In my experience as a teacher
and from observing random players at festivals and in the workshops
I teach, dulcimer
players especially exhibit so much tension that they cannot feel the chronic pain
they live with every time they play.[28] If you are unsure whether or not you are playing with
excess, unnecessary tension, find someone who can help you
assess. If that
someone also plays your instrument, that will be a huge help.
Back to list of General Questions
Will drugs heal a music-related injury?
No. They will help you
manage the pain, but will not heal what's causing the pain, and some of the side
effects from them aren't pretty, either. (One of my dulcimer friends asked
me to
supply a
laundry list of side effects here, but if kidney/liver damage alone gets the point
across, you can use your imagination from there.)[19]
Retraining in time will heal the injury and permanently relieve the pain.
Some musicians have been
directed to take non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), ibuprofen, etc. If you go this route, please do so at
bedtime or whenever you are not engaged in the activity causing the pain. DO NOT take pain-relieving drugs before you set
out to practice or perform! When you're "on something" while playing, you won't feel
any (or as much) pain, but it also means you also won't feel any additional damage you may
be doing to the affected area(s) by continuing the habits that caused the injury
in the first place!
Some medical professionals I have
spoken with recommend not taking
drugs while retraining. By avoiding drugs, you'll have the benefit
of feeling the pain go away by which to chart your progress. (This sounds
strange, but diminishing pain will also make you a believer in the retraining
you're doing.)
Note: There are plenty of web
pages on the Internet promoting drugs as the "cure". However, all
drugs will do is manage your pain; they will not heal the injury! In fact
non-steroidal, anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can actually make things worse (click
here to read a supporting a New York Times article). Retraining
provides a sound solution to healing repetitive injuries.
Back to list of General Questions
What about stretching exercises, massage,
acupuncture, etc.?
Exercising the affected area to
improve circulation, lengthen muscles and promote healing will be beneficial as
long as you have revised the habits responsible for the pain! If you
are still playing with injurious habits, any positive effects gained from
stretching, etc. will be negated once you resume playing. Ditto for massage,
acupuncture and other treatments: These procedures feel great, but persistent,
tension-laden habits in one's normal activities, including music making, will
undo all of that good feeling and put you right back where you started, in pain.
By the way, because my entire body is
in neutral whenever I play, I don't worry about taking "loosening
measures" like shaking out my arms after playing the dulcimer in
particular. The way I hammer, I shake out continually as the music
happens! That's why I can walk away feeling exhilarated after jamming for
two hours or more.
Back to list of General Questions
What about surgery?
While extreme cases of RSI/CTS may
require surgery, many times a change in playing habits and the instrument's
set-up will restore an injured player's body to balance. Note that the
internal scarring that comes from surgery may get in the way of free playing
afterwards.[21]
Following a dulcimer workshop I
taught in 2005 (where I uttered one statement about steering everyone away from
injury), one of the attendees approached me afterwards to say that she'd
developed Carpal Tunnel Syndrome from playing the piano, gotten surgery for it,
and that CTS came back shortly after she resumed playing piano again. She
told me she then started retraining, and now she's healed from the recurrence at
the piano. She was grateful for the ergonomic approach to dulcimer playing
presented during the workshop.
Back to list of General Questions
What's involved in retraining?
Accepting that retraining is
needed, and time. (I've been there; read
my story.)
For many musicians, be they casual or
serious about music-making, acceptance is the harder part. I meet people
all the time who just plain want to stick with familiar coping, no matter how
much it hurts. Excuses can run from "it's only a folk
instrument" to "it'll go away" to "at my age?"
Attitudes towards folk instruments are particularly rife with being about
rule-less playing (note that "you can play any way you want" is meant
to define styles of music, rather than haphazard ergonomics and
techniques). However, when playing that folk instrument gives you pain,
your body is telling you there are rules behind playing it, and it's time
you found out what they are. If you play a lot, or intend to, it would be
an enormously good idea to observe what about your playing is the culprit behind
the discomfort and then find out how to revise it.
No doubt about it, retraining can be
a long road. Our society is into quick: "Gimee a drug, doc!" but
it really is time that will heal the diligent (and you already know from this
question that drugs can hinder the process). And the benefit, always,
to accepting both retraining and the time it takes is easier playing and
improved sound.
Some simple things you can do, with
the help of a trained eye:
- Take a good look at your current ergonomic set-up. Ergonomics (something
that's now finally buzzing around the dulcimer community, and has been around the
autoharp community for a while) is a good start, but there's more. Keep
reading:
- Observe your biomechanics (a mirror is the cheapest video camera around. It's hard to say which I
see more: out-of-balance playing approaches (especially to the dulcimer) or
ergonomics gone awry. But, no matter. Both need attention if
you want to avoid or beat RSI.
A case in point: In another city, I
gave a private dulcimer lesson to a left-handed player who expressed concern
about pain in her right shoulder while playing. She played "The Irish
Washerwoman," striking the first measure LRR LRR. Knowing that the
dual right-hand strokes were making her eek out the second R in each LRR,
thus causing her shoulder pain, I took her through a series of short exercises
leading up to the playing of that measure using LRL RLR, thus giving both hands
enough strike time and get her forearms moving. Once her stroke
order was revised, she played the entire tune LRL RLR, but was still playing
with her wrists. Her reason for wristing: Her dulcimer was high in
relation to her arms. We looked at her personal "rest distance" between hammers and
strings, and by it set a workable dulcimer height.[6]
Her dulcimer needed to be lowered three inches! Amazingly, the lower height
automatically enabled her elbows to open and close, allowing her forearms to
manage the hammers' striking the strings instead of force-bending her
wrists. Not only did these changes completely cancel her shoulder pain,
but her dulcimer also sang in new, resonant ways.
This is just one example of how
retraining can work to a player's benefit. The specifics, of course, will
be different for each individual towards the instrument being played.
Back to list of General Questions
Have you ever needed retraining from injury?
Not from playing the dulcimer. I've been
playing
a lot and fast since my first strike in 1978 with nary a problem. Many, many
times I am the sole melody instrumentalist in a contra-dance band of only two
people. After playing nonstop for three hours
(clocking in at roughly 339.5
notes per minute), I not only leave the dance feeling fine,
I also feel fine in the
days following. In 2004, a masseur sitting in the front row at one
of my concerts told me afterwards that he looked for signs of wear and tear in
my body while I played and
couldn't find any. Something's working.
However, the computer has tried to
defeat me. Twice. I share my experiences here in hopes that
injured music makers will draw
some parallels healing from a music-related injury.
The first incident, a minor one, occurred in August
2000 while working in Yellowstone National Park. As relief night clerk at
the Old Faithful Inn, a job requiring a fair amount of typing, a tingling in my
fingers crept in during a night shift after four months on the job. Admittedly I became a little
frantic, not knowing what this might also mean for my music making. I began
troubleshooting, found the problem, then called home to have my clogs, with heels about 2 inches high, shipped
immediately. (I had decided against bringing my clogs to
Yellowstone because running was impossible in the event of a fire call in the
Inn.) It turns out that
the platforms in the front desk for the computer keyboards were set too high for
my short frame, and because they weren't adjustable, the only way I could
improve the ergonomics was to raise myself. (Can you believe that the
front desk was completely remodeled in 2006, without including adjustable
keyboard platforms?) The clogs were just the
ticket, and the tingling diminish over the next few days as I continued to on the job. Lesson learned.
The second incident was larger and more
mysterious. Early in 2005, I felt a pain slowly creeping
in at the front of my left shoulder. I thought
it was a bike injury from 1987 returning to haunt, as I had heard that pain can
revisit us as we age. As 2005 progressed, the pain gradually
increased. I was beginning to wonder if surgery was in my future, not a
happy thought.
That June, while taking a course in
Body Mapping and Alexander
Technique at Westminster Choir College, the cause of my pain came to the fore
while one of the students in the class received a piano lesson in front of the
rest of us in order to
troubleshoot an identical pain in the front of her right
shoulder. When her lesson was over and the class took a short break, I
went running to the first computer keyboard I could find.
I held down Ctrl-C with the pinky and index finger of my left hand. The
pain poured on. It turns out that the bike injury had
nothing to do with the pain. Instead, I was injuring my shoulder area from executing some much-used keystroke commands repeatedly
caused by chronic ulnar deviation at the wrist! (My left wrist
felt fine, by the way.) I
had begun using keystroke commands a few years before, partly to protect my right hand from using the mouse a lot, so this
developing injury, on my left side, was a complete surprise.
As my laptop had been along on this trip,
that very afternoon, I began retraining my hands to type keystroke commands with
the fingers of both hands.
But, easier said than done! I'd taught
myself in a snap how to copy, paste, cut, etc. with just my left hand (how clever I thought I was to come up with that
shortcut--wrong!), but retraining to
type commands using two hands was s-l-o-w. Every time I caught myself heading for a one-handed command, I
stopped
and rethought a two-handed approach. Getting anything done on the computer
that first day, and for the first three weeks, felt
like it took forever. However, after those first three weeks, both hands began
working together with less conscious effort, though I still had to (and
sometimes still have to) think a little before keying. But yes, the
two-handed commands did come more automatically in the days and weeks following, and four months
later--yes, FOUR MONTHS--the pain was gone.
Did I like changing those commands
from one to two hands? No. Did I have to do it? Yes, if I didn't want to spend the
rest of my life in pain, stop typing, stop making music, or--I don't even want to think about "or". Did I take drugs? No, there was no
need, and I got to feel the pain go away. Did I see a doctor when I got
home from the body mapping class? No. I went on the confidence of what my mentor, Barbara Conable,
said:
that the pain was due to the synovial fluid around the tendons disappearing due
to constant abrasion, and that the fluid would once again lubricate the
tendons as the injury healed. There was no sense going to a
doctor to get needless X-rays for something he or she might not be able to
detect. If I already knew the cause of the
pain and what it would take to reverse it, what more could a doctor have done? (Note: Perhaps
this case was a mild one, permitting me to work things
out on my own. Those who believe they are in really bad shape may do well
to get a medical consultation, definitely from a doctor well-versed in repetitive
and performance-related injury who will encourage retraining and save surgery as
a last resort. Healing yourself is always worth
investigating, and a medical professional who understands retraining will be gold to
you.)
As I can attest, change is hard
when what we already do feels familiar, even if it may be potentially
injurious. We don't want our music performance to fall apart, even for a
moment, due to going through the process of change. It's easy to think about
everything we are going to lose, but the glass is half full: I prefer to think instead
about what I stand to gain as a result of healthy changes in the tasks I
perform most. Why
would anyone not want to trade the inferior familiar for the superior
spectacular?
Back to list of General Questions
Where can I get more information about RSI and retraining?
In addition to private
and "B&B" lessons, I teach classes about the body in hammered dulcimer
workshops; click
here for more information.
The following books and web sites
will tell you much more, as well as encourage you:
Conable, Barbara, What
Every Musician Needs to Know about the Body,
Andover
Press, Portland OR, www.bodymap.org, 2000. An easy, informative read,
lavishly illustrated and with good humor.
Conable, Barbara, and William Conable, How
to Learn the Alexander Technique, Andover
Press, Portland OR, www.bodymap.org, 1995. An in-depth version of What
Every Musician..., above.
Pascarelli, Emil, Dr.
Pascarelli’s Complete Guide to Repetitive Strain Injury, John
Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken NJ, www.wiley.com, 2004. Dr. Pascarelli
knows more about this subject than anyone else. While much of it deals
with computer use (also good for us dulcimer players to know about) he does
address musicians, too.
Reilly, Lucille, Striking
Out and Winning! A
music-maker’s guide to the hammered dulcimer (2nd
edition), Shadrach Productions, Denver Colorado, 1992. The hammer hold and striking techniques
were put to the test in 2005 and passed. You won't find a
more complete source anywhere else to help the hammered dulcimer player play
freely.
www.bodymap.org
has some great articles about the effects of body mapping in music performance,
and will take you to still other links.
Back to list of General Questions
Hammered Dulcimer Questions
What are the likely causes of hammered dulcimer-related injuries?
It is difficult to say exactly
what creates discomfort and injury, because so many issues can contribute to
it. Misuse of the wrist doesn't necessarily mean that resulting pain will
be in the wrist. Based on what injured players have
presented to me over the years and my own studies to better understand the
causes (and head them off at the students' pass), consider these possibilities:
The dulcimer's height is too high or too low. Too low can bring the
neck and head forward, exerting downward pull on the shoulders and
spine. Too high can immobilize the body, not only limiting movement
but also reducing resonance. For information about the dulcimer set-up
that's best for you, click here.
The dulcimer tilts steeply. Since the 1990s, dulcimer tilts have
steepened sharply, up to 70 degrees! (Contrast this
with my very slight tilt, which in 1978 was considered radical in the midst of
0-degree tilt on stands!) I wanted to learn more about tilt, in June 2006 I performed a study on stand tilts/heights
to learn about their effects on playing and overall sound. When I played at a 40-degree tilt,
where increasing numbers of players set up nowadays, great pain poured onto
my upper body after only ten seconds of playing, and I experienced a
sensation of choking. No matter how I adjusted hammer hold, playing
action, etc., to make peace
with my body, the pain would
not go away while I played and in fact locked itself in for days afterward. Do steep-angle players not feel pain?
I would like to know!
Additionally, I found that the steep angle made the strings harder to see!
Well, I invite you to test tilt for yourself and with your experiences.
For specifics about dulcimer tilt, click
here. The vertical length of the dulcimer is longer than the the player's E-SP.
Players who fit these
circumstances tend to place emphasis on striking the high strings only. Therefore, an extended-range (E-R) dulcimer is usually tilted
more to make the high strings easy to reach. However, the resulting
steeper tilt usually sets the bass strings low to the arms, making them out of
the way enough to be uncomfortable to strike (which may be why players don't
also wish to focus on the low strings).
Perhaps another reason for steep tilt is subliminal: Could it
be that players want to avoid bodily contact with
the dulcimer when striking the high strings? I worked with someone who
decided to avoid contact, which in turn was also contributing to what she called
"dulcimer elbow".
I still recommend that E-R
dulcimers be set up to the same free-range angles unearthed in my height-tilt study, as
described here. Players of vertically long dulcimers will do well to consider leaning
towards, and quite possible against, the near side of the dulcimer's frame to strike the high
strings. Leaning means a
slight, forward contact, not a hard lean where the
player's body weight bears down on the dulcimer and stand. A rock-solid stand
is essential for the player who must occasionally lean against his/her dulcimer
to strike the high strings.
See this
FAQ
about E-R dulcimers for more information, especially if you are
considering purchase.
An extended-range dulcimer with a course spacing of 3/4 inches or less (measuring
from top string of one treble course to the top string of
a neighboring treble course). The suggestion to avoid
close course spacing comes from the occupational
therapist of an injured dulcimer player. Let's take a look.
With the pitch range of dulcimers
becoming larger, some builders are retaining the size of existing dulcimer frames
but reducing the space between courses in order to add more strings. This
configuration accommodates short
players desiring a wide pitch range, but now consider this: Playing up and down the
strings, and perhaps even across, requires smaller moves, which may make the
player feel "crunched", instead of open
and free. Player
height may further contribute to this equation: tall player = long bones =
smaller playing moves than a short player.
Until I can test dulcimers of
shorter course spacings especially, it seems like 7/8" is the
minimum spacing to consider, with 1"-1 1/4"
being more amenable to movement. I anticipate that a tall person will find wider spacing
to feel easier because of the long-bones equation just mentioned. There is no hard and fast rule
here; it boils down to whatever helps the player's movements feel free
rather than "scrunched" or "enclosed".
An engineering friend who does not play the
dulcimer posed this thought when I discussed course spacing with him:
Imagine taking course spacing to extremes. What would
it feel like to play a dulcimer whose treble courses were spaced 3 inches
apart? Or a dulcimer whose courses were spaced a half inch apart?
Pretend to play any tune you know well on "air dulcimers" having these
spacings. You may quickly understand the importance of course spacing
being a good fit for the music you play as well as for you.
As dulcimer pitch ranges grow, I ask myself if the community at large is asking
the dulcimer to be more
than what is practical or safe for it to be. Is the mousetrap
being overbuilt?
Playing "square". I have noticed,
both at home and in the field, a universal tendency to hold
the hammers perpendicular to the strings. Right angles are part of the box that everyone
wants to think outside of. (Go figure!) "Squaring" forces dulcimer players
to contort themselves while playing, in observance of a rule that makes no
sense.
Introducing going outside the
box: Let the angled
sides of the dulcimer clue you in on your physical approach to your
dulcimer. When you can run a straight line through your forearms and
hammers, the hammers become natural extensions of
the arms, free to strike any string, high or low. Let your forearms and hammers naturally "pigeon-toe"
towards each other. There is no appreciable affect on the sound whether the hammer strikes a
course perpendicular or at an angle, so strike with the hammers at an
angle.
"Unschooled" hammer hold. Holding the hammers
"any way that's comfortable" can have dire consequences: One player
suffered almost permanent nerve damage, which thankfully he reversed to
almost complete healing some three years later as a result of this verbatim instruction from his teacher. (What was I saying above
about time?) This demonstrates how much the
body can be thrown off when research or benefit of experience from teacher
to student is lacking, or when the new player charges in without guidance
around the known pitfalls.
Holding the hammers with the tips of the digits. (Often
resulting in squaring.) Some of you reading this
know that I have been studying hammer hold passionately for a long time (in
fact, for more than 25 years). As of May 2007: The closer the hammer handle sits to the digit tips, the
further the arm structure goes out of alignment. Why? Because the hammers
are destined to approach to the strings at the same angle, no matter how the
hammers are held, or what the relationship of the player to the dulcimer is. The body adjusts to accommodate the
hammers. When bodily contortion occurs, the player can experience
discomfort or pain.
While various players have
expressed to me the "comfort" of the pinch grip, it is far from free: When the hammer sits on the ends of
the digits, the player will hold on to it for
dear life to keep from dropping it! Which means the pinch grip is familiar
rather than comfortable! Think about this! Without a means of comparison,
there is no way of knowing what an easy hold feels like. This
story will tell you more about the importance of comparison.
The hammers! The "traditional" hammer handles, which are
curved on both top and bottom, not only tell many players to hold them with the
tips of the digits; they may also suggest that the digits alone produce the
strike action. Again, arm joints (well, body joints all over) cease to
be available to move. (By the way, when I began playing in 1978,
hammers in the US generally didn't have handles at all.)
Flexibility is key, for both playing ease and resonance.
It was big news to me when I discovered how minutely all
the joints of my hands move to execute rolls, single strikes, dynamic range,
etc. Movement is more than about the hammers and arms going up and
down. It is also about the continual adjustments the hands make for the
sake of nuance.
I recommend a single-sided hammer
(having only one strike surface) click here
to see a photograph. To order hammers like the one shown in the photo click
here.
Playing while standing or sitting still. One
dulcimer player developed DeQuervain's Tenosynovitis after six months of playing by freezing a
severely bent and hitchhiked (hyperlaxed)
thumb atop an upward-curved
hammer handle, then "pistol-gripping" the bottom of the handle
with the fingers to make the hammers go up and down. (Worse, she was
told the injury stemmed from how she had held babies 20 years before. Huh?) Still
other players freeze their
arms and move the hammers up and down from the wrists only (click
here for my thoughts
on wrist playing).
We are lucky that the dulcimer
can be readily played via the big joints. This is freeing to the
body, and to the dulcimer's sound. I am often approached by onlookers
about how much work I must be putting into my playing because I play with my
whole body. I tell them that what they're seeing is easier playing
than I would produce by barely moving. Contrary
to what some believe, playing with whole-body movement is not excessive
work, nor is it banging!
In fact, the more the body engages in the playing, the better able the
hammers are to rebound off the strings on their own, giving just the
right amount of strike with less force and more resonance. Why not have
it all? "Anything goes" stroke order. This doesn't have to be an issue, but the stop-and-go that usually lives
alternating strokes all the time or "just making do" can
be enough to cultivate discomfort, unless continuity is thought out very well
and purposely sought. This kind of stroke order often comes with a limited and/or
"horizontal" outlook towards the dulcimer's
tuning scheme. Players often have a goal to play horizontally across the
soundboard, a technical detail that is desirous when practical.
Horizontal and vertical approaches have no appreciable effect on musicality,
although they can have considerable effect on ease of playing and seeing
one's way around the strings. It
is important to be flexible enough to incorporate horizontal or vertical as
needed, as the dulcimer's unison
courses guide us, rather than to strive for one approach or the other exclusively.
See a FAQ for more by clicking here.
I use a rhythm-based stroke order
when I play. This is detailed in full in Chapter 4 of Striking Out and
Winning! This stroke order, whose downbeats are
consistently struck by the dominant hand, allows for fluid, free movement
between strikes and precise, rhythmic playing.
Buying
into "free lunch". Let's put the adage "you can play
the dulcimer any way
you want" into perspective. This is true, musically speaking: I freely improvise and
extemporize the music I play any way I want. But there is no free lunch: I cannot set
up the dulcimer, hold the hammers, strike the strings, etc., any way I
want as well. To do so comes with risk, as the injured folks whose bits and
pieces you
have read about here have already demonstrated in numerous ways[7].
Try as I might, I cannot boil a pot of water by putting it in the
refrigerator. And so it is with "free-lunch" dulcimer playing: Some
wonderful players have had to reduce the amount of playing they do, or stop altogether, with a few ending promising careers, all because they
embraced a free-form, ergonomic and/or biomechanical approach.
Cultivated habits
in everyday life. One dulcimer player was prone to holding her hammers by
the digit tips because she also held heavy glass tumblers and cans of soda pop--and who knows what all else!--with her fingertips. Now take a look at cell phones: How often do users
hold the cell phone and press the
buttons with the thumb of the same hand? There is some arm
disorganization going on there. When you
talk with your hands, do you bend your wrists into ulnar deviation?
What about holding a steering wheel while driving? Some of these
activities may influence our approaches to everything else we do, including playing the dulcimer!
For a beginning list of activities to get you thinking about what you do
every day, click
here.
Back to list of dulcimer questions
What are some tangible things a hammered dulcimer
player can do to play freely?
In addition to all that appeared in response to the previous question:
Balance your body to achieve full stature and ultimate freedom.**
The Alexander Technique advocates, "The head leads, the body
follows." Which way does the head lead? UP, not forward!
Cultivate an accurate body map in order to understand how your body is designed to function,
then work with
it, not against it.** This doesn't require taking an anatomy
or physiology class;
there are some good books out there to
help you get on the page.
Some
common body-mapping errors of dulcimer players are:
1) Bending at the waist--The fashion industry gave us waists; the
skeletal structure,
alas, does not include one. We bend at the hips, just in case you
wondered. Try it and see!.
2) Muscles in the fingers and thumb--The digits do not have muscles, only tendons. Fine-motor
coordination comes from the large muscles of the arm.
3) Joints of the arm structure--Most folks say there are three, but
there are really four. Percussionists, including dulcimer players,
will do well to create a fifth joint at the point of "stick hold"!
4) Joints of the fingers and thumb--how many are there? You'll
use them according to what your answer is!
4) Arm organization through the thumb--the arm organizes through little finger, as
mentioned below in hammer hold.
5) Short arms--Now that you know where the first joint of the arm is,
you can see that your arms are much longer than you thought! Remember:
If you believe your arms are short, it is possible that you
will use them like they are short.
6) "Relaxed" shoulders--These often translate into shoulders
being at
their lowest possible point, limiting mobility of the arm structure and
creating finger tingles and shoulder pain.
Understand where the music comes from: Music is a 75-25 proposition,
with 75% comes from the player.
Because we make the music, we must move to make it!
Neither the dulcimer nor the hammers can produce sound without the player's
help.
Know that stands and hammers can be the biggest culprits behind
discomfort. There is no way to achieve neutrality in the body when poorly
designed accessories won't allow it. Unfortunately, I am hearing more
and more horror stories about physical/occupational therapists who don't know that
dulcimer accessories
may well be central to a player's injury, possibly
because they have never seen a dulcimer up close, nor are they aware of the
global range of differences in stands and hammers. As a result, some
wonderfully knowledgeable professionals are molding bodies around inanimate objects, instead of
the other way around. (More about stands and hammer design in the next
three entries below.)
Use a stand that's fully adjustable in both tilt and height, and set
both where YOU need them. Just because the stand can produce a
large range of tilts doesn't mean that all tilts are advantageous, safe or
usable. Fully adjustable stands need the long slots so that tall players can set up the dulcimer
to
suitable height.
No matter what the tilt and height, the hammers
are always going to orient at the same relationship to
the dulcimer. For this to happen, the body will adjust itself. Our goal is to ensure that those adjustments are for the
benefit of both the body and the music.
Remember your shoes: Your height will change when your
shoe height differs at practice vs. at a gig. You'll need to be
able adjust the dulcimer's height to maintain the same relationship to the
dulcimer when in dress shoes as when practicing with sneakers on your feet,
or bare feet, at home. (I now own "dulcimer shoes" for
formal concerts.)
Also, because the dulcimer's angle is
different for sitting and standing to play, a fully adjustable stand is a good investment.
The hammer handle, if there is one, needs to be flat on top and
curved (or flat) on the bottom. This design supports a neutral hammer hold (see also next
point).[23] But buyer beware: Even some handles fitting this description
confound the player when they are wide (meaning the width you see as you look down at
the handles when holding them). The best fit comes from a handle whose width is about
half that of the middle phalanx (the area between the creases on
the skin) of the straight index finger.
Certain non-handled hammers can be fine, as long as they balance amicably in
the hands. I have some long ones in my collection that feel top-heavy and sluggish when the
ends of the shafts land in the same place under my thumb as shown in the photo below. But when I
"choke up" more on the shafts to achieve a lively and
agreeable balance, the end of the shaft lodges under my palm so that the hammer
cannot swing up and down freely. The shaft ends can always be trimmed
shorter,
but trimming also re-balances the hammers' center of
gravity. Saw at your own risk.
Some upward-curved handles are okay as long as the curve is
very slight; note that this produces a small loss of hammer flexibility when
playing. The key to a free
hammer hold comes from the thumb aligning with the hammer shaft. It's a good idea to hold the hammer and
see if it lets your thumb align with the shaft. If not, keep looking.
(At the Original Dulcimer Players
Club 2007 Funfest, I met a pair of double-sided hammers having handles that
looked odd enough not to work but instead agreed amicably with the hands and
fingers! Unfortunately, the maker of those hammers won't make them
commercially. Let's all hope he changes his mind!)
Establish a neutral hammer
hold. The neutral hammer hold sets the
hammer between the creases on the index finger so the thumb
can simply rest on top of and in line with the handle, as shown in the photo
below.[15] The handle
shape allows the hammer to be held
over the center of the hand, freeing all joints. If
you have never held your hammers this way before, expect it to feel
different for
a little while (if you play a lot, you'll ease into this quickly). Hang in
there, especially if you're an
experienced player who is retraining.
The neutral hold sets both
hand and wrist in a neutral
rest relationship and
allows the entire hand to hold and support the hammer, while
allowing inertia to participate in strike and rebound. This hold also
allows all joints in the hand to flex in minute increments to produce the
various nuances for single strokes, rolls, dynamic
range and the
like. Plus,
a neutral hold encourages bending the elbows so that the forearms take the hammers down to and away from the
strings (which, by the way, can be struck gently as well as firmly),
allowing players to use the large arm muscles.
The result of a neutral hold is always flexibility with full-bodied
resonance from the dulcimer.[1]
"Pigeon-toe" the hammer tips towards each other.[24] This is
easy to do once a neutral hammer hold is in place. See Chapter 2 of Striking Out and
Winning! for the pictures.
The
stand, both in height and angle, must allow
the elbows to be
open 90
degrees or slightly more before playing begins[20], something a
free-range angle allows, as long as the dulcimer isn't too high for the
player.[7] You may wind up standing or
sitting further from the dulcimer than you usually do to open your
elbows this much, but look for the strings angling toward each other, as
shown in the photo at right. (I took this photo after playing in G
major to establish my normal playing distance from the dulcimer; the photo
shows exactly what I see with my dulcimer tilted to 10 degrees. The bridge mark,
barely visible in the center of the photo, identifies the G-D treble course.)
When you see angling strings,
you will be able to discern the treble from the bass strings. If the strings look parallel,
you are either
too close to the dulcimer or its tilt is too steep. And one more thing: Don't jut your head forward to make up for
your body being further
away! This will crook your neck as well as tighten it, which in turn
will tense the rest of your body (remember: when you can't move, you can't play).[22]
Instead adjust your vision (angling strings will be a different look
indeed), and if you must get your head closer, bend at the hips a little to
bring it forward.
Bend the elbows to strike the strings via the forearms. My
wrists adjust passively as the hands/hammers go up and down, the same as shaking
hands with a friend. This way, they can respond to the ever-changing relationship
between hand and forearm as the hand goes up and down.[20] The
forearms move freely,
not forcefully, and they don't have to move a lot. As long as the hammers
are free to "swing" up and down in response to the forearms, they will finish nicely what the
forearms started, with substantial, easy contact on the strings and full,
resonant sound.
Know all the ins and outs of the dulcimer's tuning layout. Do you know how many visual patterns
there are by which to play a one-octave major scale with alternating strokes
throughout? Most players know there are two or three, but there are
more than this. (See Striking Out and
Winning! for the answer.) Ditto for unisons and octaves, as
well as adjusting stroke
order to agree with the rhythm of the tune, not the dulcimer's tuning or the
tune's pitches.[25] The more you know,
coupled with a rhythm-based stroke order (i.e., strong-hand lead, with
the dominant hand striking all the downbeats in a reel, for example), the
more you can move gracefully and in agreement with yourself while making music.
Be less obsessed with where a tune's notes are on the dulcimer. Almost
every
time I ask a student to watch my arms or my body as I demonstrate an
essential point of how the body moves to make music, his or her gaze usually heads
for the strings instead. Ah, the fear of not being able to play if we don't know what
strings to strike! (That's where practice and strike-pattern
perception come in. My hands move way too fast for anyone to see
precisely where I'm striking, anyway, so watching the tips of the hammers is
futile.) Yes, we all want to play "right
notes"--my students make gorgeous-sounding mistakes!--but
let me say again how essential it is to know how to play yourself to find musical expression.
Allow your body's relationship to the dulcimer to change while
playing. Playing the high strings? Move your body closer to the
dulcimer by moving one foot forward. Hanging around the bass strings for a while?
Move one foot back. If you sit to play, lean
forward or back from the hips, which means your back needs to be far from any
back there may be on the chair.
Playing a tune that's all to the left of the treble
bridge? Lean to the left and turn a bit to angle yourself to the dulcimer and
face those strings! Do your hammers have to sweep across the dulcimer to play
a long arpeggio? Sweep your body sideway to help those hammers along.
If you
want to play all over your dulcimer (or if you're like me and have to), it is much harder to do under the
auspices of playing "square" from one
planted spot.
And here is a surprise: Some dulcimers won't let
the player face
the strings squarely!
Treble bridges that are either dead vertical (90º) to
the bottom edge of the soundboard or slanting slightly to the left can trouble
a player's left shoulder area if the player sits or stands square to the
dulcimer! (I have a plastic T-square from my pre-computer publishing days that
makes determining bridge angle quickly.) Dulcimers having this kind of treble-bridge orientation tend
to be shaped like irregular trapezoids, with the sides being different
lengths and angles. The good news is that players whose treble bridges
are set vertically or slanting left can turn
slightly to the left to give the left arm and shoulder area both breathing and
movement room.
Move with your playing![10] This
is kinesthesia at its best, when you feel the joy within the spaciousness of
free hammering from the first note to the last! I don't know where the notion
came from to remain as still as possible while hammering, but still playing means stiff playing,
and that can be pain-producing. When the arms stop in between strikes, playing
feels like you are tapping your car brakes every 10 feet--it gets uncomfortable and tiring
quickly, and it's a struggle to get where you're going.[5] Nonstop to Toledo,
please. So, listen to your
body--and your dulcimer! The
dulcimer is more than about those visual patterns we perceive on the strings, it's also
about how we orient ourselves towards those patterns, too. And when you
move your body along with the series of patterns that comprise a tune, you'll be
able to reach every strike point easily. Movement has everything to do with
musicality, ease of playing negotiating large
leaps in a tune, etc.
Forget about "controlling" the hammers. Every player
I have met who believes they have to control the hammers plays with excessive, needless
tension that makes them sound like they're slamming the poor dulcimer into
the floor! It takes far less effort to strike the strings when you
let the hammers fall and rebound on
their own as generated by the continuous momentum of the arms and body. As I say in Striking Out and
Winning!: You have to lose
control to gain it.[20] The hammers will know
what to do when you let them.
Back to list of dulcimer questions
Go
to Resources
What is the best height and tilt for my dulcimer?
This is a great question, because
the best height and tilt for your dulcimer is indeed yours! Dulcimer height is different for
everyone, and here is a surprise about where it comes from: It is based
not on the player's height, but rather on the
measurement from the end of the elbow to the strike point (not the end) of
the hammer (what I call E-SP). Think about it: This makes a lot
of sense, doesn't it?! Further, know that the dulcimer's tilt affects its height:
the smaller the tilt, the lower the dulcimer's height, and vice versa.
In June 2006, I performed a study on
dulcimer tilt, which included height. I played the same scales and tunes all over the
dulcimer, starting at 40 degrees and working my way down to minus-5 degrees, in
5-degree increments. Dulcimer height was necessarily and gradually reduced
with each new tilt. Through all the playing, I listened to my body for
comfort level (or lack thereof) and took copious notes throughout concerning
feel (comfort vs. pain, with descriptions) and ease of playing. The most
comfortable "free-range" angles were these:
Standing to play: 10-15 degrees
Sitting to play: 20-25 degrees.
That's it! Within this "free range," you can achieve neutrality
throughout your
body in order to play spaciously and easily for long periods of time
(some of those jam
sessions can be long, as you know, and you may want to stick them out without missing a note).
It's easy to find a free-range tilt using an inclinometer purchased from the
hardware store. (I use mine all the time to set new
students' dulcimers up; for one-time use, ask around the neighborhood to
see who has one that you can borrow for a half hour. Or set up your
dulcimer in the hardware store....) Steep tilts, especially 30+
degrees, make a neutral starting place for the hands impossible to
establish and limit the core movement essential to musical music and a free
feeling when playing. They also situate the arms to oppose gravity
while playing, reducing endurance and
increasing the pain. (Note that you may cut off blood circulation as
well; um, do you really want to do that?)[7]
Once the tilt lands within range, the
dulcimer's height is determined by the rest distance created by your E-SP,
by bending your arms so both forearms and hammers are parallel to the floor,
with the strike points held over a center course (often G at the bridge mark in
first position). Rest distance ensures
that your arms have adequate space to take the hammers down to the
strings. I have set the rest distance for many players now with great
results, eliminating guesswork about dulcimer set-up. But now note this:
Rest distance is not also a boundary defining how high the arms and hammers can go
when they're on the rebound after striking. Rest distance is nothing more
than a set-up tool. To learn more, for a private lesson, or I'll be glad to come to your area to
teach a workshop where a lot of players can have the benefit of setting up
to feel and see the difference. (Yes, see it, too. Click
here.)
Remember: the lesser the tilt,
the lower the stand.[6] No matter what tilt
you choose, the dulcimer's height will need adjustment as well.
How can I check for smooth movements in my
hammering?
Perhaps the best place to look
first is by considering your personal play list. If your list favors reels
and jigs and other fast tunes, and you can play them up to tempo at a jam
session without batting an eye, you are probably moving quite smoothly.
Play lists that favor slow pieces
necessarily include a lot of space in between strikes, offering continual
opportunities to stop the arms, creating tension. Along these lines, I
also listen to what else players tell me about the multitude of slow pieces they
play. While it's true that slow pieces are certainly less
"frenetic" than fast dance tunes, favoring slow pieces may also
indicate (forgive me, I read between the lines here) that halting moves or other
issues prevent playing faster with ease, and so slow pieces may be the only
effective choice. Whatever the cause, this may also be the reason behind a
"nasal" sound quality that the player is also avoiding (which,
frankly, I wouldn't want to listen to, either).
If you are playing reels and
struggling to keep up with the usual tempo range of 100-120 (5),
this could be a good indication of tension-laden hammering. A teacher who
can help you smooth your moves (rather than one whose mission is right notes) is
vital to the process. Many things contribute to smooth playing, right down
to the hammers used and the dulcimer's tilt on the stand. A teacher who
understands this and much more can help you begin to implement retraining during
the first lesson of a series of lessons.
Back to list of dulcimer questions
I was told to play with my wrists. Is this
okay?
You may already know from my books
and elsewhere on this web site that I am a
big fan of a playing action that comes from using the entire arm, rather than the wrist only.
I have softened my thoughts about wrist playing in recent years, and realize now that it can be done
safely, depending on how the wrists are used. If the
wrists take turns moving (what I call "rough wristing"), rather than
simultaneously moving the hands up and down ("smooth wristing"), then the player
will tire easily, with his playing reaching a tempo threshold. Smooth
wristing allows for faster playing, although the tempo threshold still remains lower
than for forearm playing.[5--definitely look at this
footnote; it's fascinating!] I have seen players use smooth wristing and
have to say in observing them overall that their bodies seem to be
free. I will understand more about this as my observation skills continue
to develop.
Now for my concerns about wrist
playing:
- Wrist
action invites halting movements when striking the strings,
because the movements are necessarily smaller with only the hand going up and
down. This is particularly true in slow
pieces. Long notes need slow body movement between strikes. When
less of the body is engaged in the playing, the movements get less space to move
in, making those movements necessarily smaller. The time space is harder
to fill completely within the smaller area the movement is able to fill.
- With wrist movement being devoted to the act of playing, the wrists become
disabled from creating nuance in technique, dynamic
range, etc. Decide what you want from the music you play. If
right notes is enough, then safe wrist playing will be okay. On the
other hand, if musical phrasing is what you are after, you need full
flexibility of your hands and arms.
Will I therefore teach
students to play with a wrist action? Likely, no. The resulting
overtones produce a tone that is more thin and brassy than my ear prefers.
(Wrist playing may why so many
dulcimer players resort to leather-backed hammers.) And these days I am
learning more about how my wrists contribute to whole-body action, some I and my
students would lose if our wrists became the focus of hammer action. I achieve a pure,
fundamental tone in my playing with wooden strike surfaces as it stands
now, and will continue to nurture this within myself and my students.
Back to list of dulcimer questions
How do I know when my wrists are in neutral?
Finding neutral wrists is quick, easy and fun!
- Hold your hands out in front of you, palms down and fingers lightly
contacting each other.
- Tuck both thumbs under your hands so you can't see them.
- Now look at your hands in relation to your arms. When the
hands/fingers come straight out from the arm, the wrists are in
neutral. When the hands/fingers angle to the arms, the wrists are
bent.[35]
Back to list of dulcimer questions
Return to autoharp question about neutral wrists
Is it better to stand or sit when playing?
I do both, standing to perform
concerts, and sitting to play contra dances or sometimes to practice at home. Either
way, I set up the dulcimer to achieve the greatest
biomechanical advantage when playing. Set-up helps impact my
sound in positive ways. Dulcimer height and angle change with each orientation.
When standing, again the
optimum angle range for the dulcimer is 10-15 degrees.[7]
Within this range, all kinds of
wide-angle movement become available by moving one foot (I move both feet while
playing, but only one at a time) forward,
diagonally, sideways or backward and swaying the body around to take the
hammers
all over the soundboard without opening the arms excessively to reach far-away
strike points.
When sitting, the
optimum dulcimer angles are 20-25 degrees.[7]
Duplicating the kind of
movement that comes from standing originates now from the pelvis instead of the
feet, combined with the distance of the chair from the dulcimer, which is partly
determined by the key(s)/range being played in. It is important to have both an adjustable
stand and chair when sitting to play. If the stand won't go low enough to
assist biomechanical
advantage, an adjustable chair can be raised. And if the chair is
non-adjustable but too high, you can raise the dulcimer stand. Either way,
remember that both feet need to be on the floor. Feet resting above the
floor on stool
rungs present balance difficulties.[10]
Why are the tilt ranges
different for standing and sitting? (Yes, I find this curious, too.)
This seems rooted in core movement originating from the feet for standing and
the pelvis for sitting. The steeper tilt for sitting simply enables the
player to cover the same lateral range over the strings with much the same ease
from the pelvis as a standing player would from the feet.
I can't thank you enough for
all the dulcimer stand information. I came home [from your workshop in
Albuquerque] and
immediately *fixed* my 2 stands; I feel much better.... The new [tilt and
height] makes playing so much easier, not to mention
more accurate. I didn't realize how much I was *fighting* the dulcimer's
[set-up]. Thank you for everything!!
--Harriet Marvin, beginner (not rank any more!) dulcimer player, Texas
Back to list of dulcimer questions
Should I wear wrist splints while
playing the dulcimer to avoid bending my wrists to strike the strings?
No, because*:
- the wrists need to be flexible when hammering. The truth
is, for the hammers to be ready to strike anywhere on the dulcimer, the hands
need to remain somewhat level while playing. The
only way they can do that with the arms going up and down all the time is if the wrists adjust,
similar to shaking
hands with a friend.[20]
- I've seen dulcimer players who wear splints still try to hammer through
them with a wrist action. No benefit there. It would seem that dulcimer players who bend their wrists despite such splints would
experience even more pain, fighting against imposed rigidity.
- I believe that at least part of the wrist pain for a dulcimer player comes from how the hammers
are held, so adopting a neutral hammer hold
is a safe and free solution. It will also help to
avoid a "pinch grip" between the fingers and thumb when picking up items
in the course of performing everyday tasks.
A cashier at my local supermarket
routinely picks up 3-5 lb. packages of meat with a pinch grip, and the two
wrist splints he wears indicate that this habit is giving him grief.[13]
*If you are prone to bending your
wrists while sleeping, wrist splints will help at night.
Help your nighttime efforts out by focusing on retraining
during the day.
Back to list of dulcimer questions
I've been holding my hammers "out of
whack", according to what's on this page, for a long time, and I don't feel
any pain. What's so bad about the "pinch grip"? It seems
like every player I know is using it!
Well, let's take
our time on this thought. Bear in mind
that tension distorts sensation[35], which means we don't
feel pain when our muscles are tight as banjo strings. But when we release
those tense muscles and restore neutral, we then often discover that we
were in pain when under tension.
Here is a dulcimer-related case
in point: I once worked with a dulcimer player--a nurse, in fact--who claimed
she didn't have any pain from "pinch-gripping"
her hammers. From the hammers' playing position, she pointed to the top of her
forearm just above her wrist while explaining to me that this area needed to be relaxed
(ironic, because her wrist was stuck in ulnar deviation, which meant that she
was already placing a lot of stress on that area). I then showed her a neutral hammer
hold, which she continued to use while we went on to explore how she could
incorporate core movement to play freely. About 20 minutes later, she had had enough time to
play with the
neutral hold to feel the previously unnoticed pain in the "relaxed" area
of her arm go away. (Note: Before this, she had been playing
some tunes by herself with the pinch grip, so she was already "tuned
up" to feel a difference.) She confessed then and there that she didn't know
that the pinch grip had been pain-producing. So, while you may not seem to feel pain--anywhere--from
a tension-laden hammer hold, it
may be that you have yet to experience a neutral poise in the hands and wrists to
understand what it's like to play the dulcimer pain-free.
The reasons you may not have
experienced discomfort or injury due to a pinch
grip could be based on the kinds of tunes you're playing (slow tunes like
waltzes, rather than driving reels with multitudes of notes), how often you play
(once
a week vs. every day) and for how long (15 minutes per session vs. two hours on
your own or at the local jam session). As more and more players are
discovering, when the amount of playing and number of notes played per minute
steps up, pain can "mysteriously" appear when the hammer hold and
other points of playing are "out of whack." Plus, your dulcimer
and your ears (and everyone else's) miss out on the deep, sustaining
resonance that comes with a neutral hold. Why settle for average when you
can have incredible?
And now a postscript to the above response from Kay S. Hooper, B. Mus., M. Mus., ATI Certified Alexander Technique Teacher:
"One of my Alexander Technique teachers, Bruce Fertman,
said that the brain learns by
contrast, better or worse, darker or lighter, faster or slower, and so on.
So if we have no point of comparison, we tend to go with habit. Further,
it can be suggested to a player that maybe he or she will play better or have
more enjoyment from playing by making a change, which can then lead to the
discovery just explained in the above response to this question.
"I have a
20-year-old Alexander Technique/piano student who has the most damaging ideas
about playing. He was an athlete in high school and quite muscular, so I
think he got through for a long time without pain because of the sheer strength
of his muscles. This also contributes to his piano-playing issues, because
he has the common connection between strength and tension that weightlifters
can get: the ideal of tight muscles as a goal, the tightness being unnecessary
for playing the piano. As he
continues to release this tension, he is discovering how much of both his pain
and his technical limitations are due to his belief in tight muscles as being
ideal. He is also realizing that he has control over the tension/pain
pattern."
(Kay is the author of Sensory
Tune-ups: a guided journal of sensory experiences for performers of all ages.
In this book, she describes lots of great ways to tune in to the body while
playing any musical instrument. Check Kay's book out at www.allsensepress.com.
–LR)
Back to list of dulcimer questions
I have arthritis in the joints of my fingers. Should I still
attempt the neutral principles of holding the hammers and striking the strings
as you advise,
or am I on my own?
For those with arthritis and other
"digital challenges," come as
close as you
can to assume neutral, as described in the previous question.
Thus far, every digitally challenged
dulcimer player I have worked with has been able to strike
the strings via the forearms by opening and closing the elbow joints.
Hammer hold for the digitally
challenged is often more tricky. Thankfully, holding the hammers in
neutral uses the entire hand, instead of the thumb and index finger only.
Some digitally challenged players have done fine with this hold, although others
struggle with it. It all depends on the nature of each digital challenge,
and no two are alike. The whole idea of
hammer hold--for every dulcimer player--as presented in the text and
photo of this question above, is to minimize
the amount of physical pressure applied to hold the hammer: The more pressure
the thumb places on the handle, the harder it is to hold the hammer
securely!
I am unaware of hammer makers who
design handles for digitally challenged dulcimer players. I highly
recommend, of course, that any hammer makers doing so would design the handle so that the player can hold it with the thumb aligned
with the hammer shaft,
rather than angled to it. It never ceases to amaze me how the aligned
thumb and forearm positively impact the dulcimer's resonance, something every dulcimer
player deserves! Beyond this, an aligned thumb allows adequate thumb
flesh to secure the hammer in the hand.
If you are a hammer maker reading this
response and can fashion hammers for special needs, please so I can pass your contact information on to those in need.
Back to list of dulcimer questions
Autoharp questions
What are the likely causes and effects of autoharp-related injuries?
(Note: String hand (arm, thumb,
etc.) is
the hand or other body part connected to wearing the fingerpicks; button hand
(thumb, etc.) is
the hand or other body part connected to depressing the chord bars.)
Some of the causes of autoharp discomfort
are:
- Positioning the autoharp low in relation to the body/forearms.
- Forcing the player's head forward from the neck to see the strings.
- One or both wrists is/are in a constant state of forward flexion (oddly, I've
noticed this to be the left wrist for women and the right wrist for men, but
there seems to be a good reason for this).
- One or both wrists in radial or ulnar deviation (bent sideways, like a
windshield wiper, and stuck there).
- Picking the strings with a "bear-claw" string hand, where the
fingers bend from the "doorknocker joints."
- A misconceived perception of where to pluck the strings with the picks.
- Strumming by using only the wrist.
- Strumming by using only the thumb.
- Mismapped (misunderstood/misperceived) arm structure, particularly
regarding arm rotation.
- Mismapping the hand in the arm structure when
playing "thumb
lead.".
- A motionless string arm, with wrists, fingers and/or thumbs alone doing the playing.
- "Hitchhiking" either thumb back and away (the left thumb is
barely used, the playing thumb has times when it doesn't play).
- Picking all the melody notes, especially fast notes, with one finger.
- Routinely using the button thumb to depress chords (usually when the
I-IV-V buttons are set up in triangles instead of in rows).
And here are the results:
- DeQuervain's tenosynovitis (resulting in pain generated in the "Gaza
Strip" between the thumb and index finger; you'll recognize this area
easily when looking at the back of the left hand; look for its mirror in the right).
- Strain/tingling in the string hand.
- Strain/tingling in the button hand.
- Wrist of the string hand tires from strumming quickly.
- "Crunching" of forearm muscles in string hand: The autoharp's height
may need to be reset to place the string arm in neutral position over the
strings.
- Co-contraction via strumming from the wrist or thumb from a motionless forearm.
Back to list of autoharp questions
What are some tangible things I can do to avoid
injury when playing the autoharp?
- Balance your head on your spine.[10]
- Sit on an armless chair with a sturdy seat (those portable, mushy canvas
chairs at festivals are convenient to tote around, but...).
- Set up your autoharp in relation to your body so you can play with free
arms and neutral wrists (see next question).
- Remove your playing arm from the body of the autoharp; a quarter inch will
do the job. This frees not just your forearm but also your elbow, so
that you can experience the entire length of your arm when playing and reach
all the strings on the autoharp with ease, especially the highest strings.
- Use the large muscles of your arms to play (see next
question).
- Explore all the ways your shoulders and arms can move, as well as all
the joints of the arm. They are designed to go all over the place![34]
- Use more than one finger to pick melodies, and alternate those fingers in
fast passages. I use index, middle and ring (plus the thumb for
harmony below, of course); the index and middle get the most use, but the
ring finger is in there enough to smooth the playing out. This does marvelous things for phrasing the music, by the
way.
- Where possible, let the fingering order of many notes follow the shape of
the melody: For notes going up, it's i-m-r; for notes going down,
it's r-m-i. Note that other fingering combinations come into
play, such as one that I call "the wave" (r-m-i-m).
- My own downbeat pinches for diatonic playing are usually (but not always)
the index or ring finger plus the thumb. I'm not sure where a downbeat pinch with the middle
finger came around, but considering the previous point, this doesn't make
sense. The middle finger is longer than the index, so when the string
hand is positioned over the strings, the middle finger is naturally poised
to strike a higher string. Middle-finger pinching also sets the hand
in a "rest" position of ulnar deviation (hand pointing down from
the wrist), far from rest.
- On the string hand, bend the fingers from the knuckles when fingerpicking. The other
finger joints will bend slightly, too, but without letting the
fingers curl up; curved fingers are key. Avoid originating the bending from the
"door-knocker" joints (the next set of joints down from the
knuckles), which usually comes from a static playing
hand hovering too close to the strings. To avoid crunching the fingers
at the door-knocker joints, lift your hand away from the strings after each
pinch. Lifting the hand comes from the arm, by the way, not the wrist.
A doorknocker-joint bender who
converted to bending at the knuckles to pinch-pluck shared this with me
about the improvement in her diatonic, "pumping felt" autoharping
as a result of the change: "I felt like I had
arthritis in my finger joints when I awakened in the morning. [The pain]
would work its way out during the day, but I think that playing the autoharp
definitely was a part of this (although not the total problem). I am not
having that problem now, and so feel that the fact that I was trying to curl
my fingers over the strings was directly at issue. I have a long way to go
to get my [hand away from] the autoharp and [teaching my fingers to bend] from
the knuckles, but it is definitely better."
- On the button hand, use the entire forearm to depress chords with
the index, middle and ring fingers, not just the fingers themselves.
- Avoid using the button-hand thumb routinely to depress chords, as this
creates undue stress and takes the left wrist out of neutral. I rarely use
the thumb (for only two pieces in my repertoire, and in each very seldom) to
depress the Isus4 chord in the bottom row, doing so only with the side
of my thumb.
- If, when holding a diatonic autoharp upright, the lockbars are nearest
your nose, do not rest the button thumb atop the closest lockbar.
Instead, poise it naturally over the chord bars (avoid a "hitchhiker
thumb").
- Release the inactive button thumb and partially inactive string thumb to
restore their slight neutral curve forward. You'll probably want to
keep an eye on both while playing so your eyes can teach you what to
feel. To avoid bending your head down and subsequently throwing your
neck out of alignment, watch your thumbs in a mirror.[33]
- Should the finger joints "hyperbend" in the opposite direction
when depressing chord bars, raising your hand a little higher (from the
floor) over the chord buttons, as well as a little further away from the
buttons, can help. You might also check the wear on the chord-bar
felts and the action on the bars if you feel like you're working too hard to
depress them.
Back to list of autoharp questions
Is it better to stand or sit when playing?
I sit, but continue to research autoharp placement for standing because so many players stand to
play. My reasons for sitting are these:
- For the solo work I do in performance, I believe that sitting looks more "classical"
and congruous with the type of playing I do.
- I sometimes play with my eyes closed, and don't want to fall over!
- For the sake of amicable ergonomics that I haven't yet been able to find
standing up.
So, what can be said about about
standing? A little study and experimentation at the June 2007 Mountain
Laurel Autoharp Gathering and since sheds the following light as of July 27,
2007:
- The arms must be situated so that there is no need for them to support the
autoharp's weight or tilt. That goes for sitting as well as standing,
but the point here is clear: If you're going to stand to play, you need
something that will support the autoharp while it's on you without
your help.
- One joint, and possibly two, in the arm structure are missing from the
body maps of many players. As a result, many autoharpists play with
unnecessary tension, and possibly also think that their arms are shorter
than they really are.
- Autoharpists cannot rely on a specific, fixed point on the body by which
to establish autoharp height when standing to play. One woman at MLAG
2007 shared with me a suggestion given to her that the uppermost corner of
the autoharp land 1½ inches above her ear. Once she, at 5 feet tall,
found out where her arms needed to be in order to play freely, the top
corner of the autoharp landed two inches above her head! The location
of the autoharp on a 6-foot autoharpist will be different again. When
the body size changes while the size of the autoharp does not, fixed points
of reference on the body prove to be unreliable.
- Most standing autoharpists wear the autoharp too low in relation to their
lower arms. At MLAG 2007 and the ODPC Funfest in Evart MI, I
demonstrated how to find the best autoharp placement for any body
type, which is higher for most players than initially thought.
- I am finding that autoharp strap arrangements as we know them are designed
with a man's upper torso in mind, which a woman's bust line confounds.
Since MLAG 2007, I learned that once a strap set-up, including
strap-button placement on the autoharp, is designed for a woman, it will
also work well for a man.
- Although the "Slider" strap seems to have been designed
specifically for autoharp, at the moment, it routinely sets the autoharp too
low to the arm structure. However, I am seeing a glimmer of hope that
may turn this around as experiments continue. We'll see.
- Setting the autoharp high enough to maximize arm-structure function often
causes the top of the autoharp to tip far over to the player's left, causing
severe bending in the right wrist when playing. In the case of the
"Slider" strap, the shorter loops that would raise the autoharp
also causes discomfort in the left armpit area.
All I can say right now is to
stick with this page to see how all of this will turn out, hopefully for the
better! (Ladies, the jury is still out on what's best for us. I
advise holding off on purchasing a strap of any kind until more is known.)
For the moment, sitting to play is the best way to establish and use
an optimum autoharp height for you. Go on to the next question
for set-up how-to information.
Back to list of autoharp questions
It sounds like neutral wrists are essential when
playing. How do I find neutral wrists?
First, click
here to learn about neutral wrists.
As I mentioned two
questions ago, what I've noticed is that the left (button) wrist sustains flexion in
women, while the right (playing) wrist sustains flexion in men when the autoharp
is held upright against the chest. While that sounds curious, there seem
to be some good reasons for these differences.
First, a couple general points:
- Despite
gender, all autoharpists are created unequal, with differences in arm length as well
as height and girth (and where the girth is: in the bust line or the "beer
belly"). For example, it's possible for a tall man to have
shorter arms than a man who is shorter in height. Likewise for
women.
- The autoharp needs to be stabilized. If you have to hang on to it
with your forearms while playing to keep it from running away, you'll have to
tense up a good portion of both the arms and upper torso to do that. The solution
doesn't necessarily mean attaching straps to the autoharp and wearing
it. I'm not so sure wearing the autoharp to stand is
advantageous. While it seems that the straps that cross in back clear
the shoulder blades, the autoharp still presses a downward pull upon the
spine by virtue of its weight (this is most noticeable in the pelvis, which
may tend to tilt forward and upward, to "balance" the body while
the autoharp is being worn). Downward pull is not a free feeling for
anyone, whether wearing autoharp or not.
What follows is a lump sum of
solutions. Please note that they are based upon sitting to play. Read
everything, then use what applies to you, and feel free to
make adjustments; none of this is static, but dynamic. As I said, our
bodies are all different, so it takes moving limbs and joints around to find
what works. A mirror nearby can help you while you're searching.
Left wrist
When the left (button) wrist
flexes perpetually, two things are usually going on: 1) the left elbow is too
far back, likely next to the body; and 2) the autoharp is low in relation to the
left hand and arm. The elbow being too far back tends not to be a problem for men because they
lack the "anterior endowment" that women have. However, a couple
of male autoharpists hold their autoharps quite high, and they may have
unwittingly caught
on to the biomechanical advantage that this position affords.
So women: Note that moving the elbow forward enough for the forearm to
release wrist flexion means that the elbow rises, too (remember: the upper arm
is on an axis at the shoulder). This creates a new situation: the autoharp
becomes low to the hand, which is why the left wrist bends down: the fingers
need to reach the buttons, but this flexed position leads to strain. The way to a neutral wrist,
then, is to raise the autoharp.
For years, I crossed my left
leg over my right to raise my autoharp, but discovered during the body
mapping class I took in June 2005 that my playing endurance and
right-hand finger freedom increased, in addition to gaining a neutral left
wrist, when I raised the autoharp even higher. While normal cross-legging may raise the autoharp enough
for some players (and if it does for you, that may be okay, but keep reading), it wasn't for me, despite
my seemingly "lanky" arms. The trick was finding a way to
anchor the autoharp atop something that it wouldn't slide off. I made and
tried out "prostheses" from layers of sturdy craft
foam, pillows, a flattened roll of organic toilet tissue (nothing but the best,
but try explaining that to your audience during a formal concert)...the
autoharp was never positioned quite right, and it slid around and eventually off
the object.
In July 2006, I was astonished to
realize that I'd been wearing the answer for several years: a hip pouch. Notice in the
photograph below right that my pouch has a "lid", as shown by the zipper curving
around the top front, rather than being shaped like a large, external pocket, where
the zipper goes across the top and center.
(At its widest point, the lid
measures 3 1/4 inches, excluding the black zipper tapes.) My usual contents of wallet,
eyeglass case, etc.
being too rigid to allow shaping the lid into a kind of "seat" for the
autoharp, I went to the grocery store and bought a 1 lb. bag of
peanuts in the shell, most of which went in a small plastic sack (like
the type you get when buying a couple small items at a drug store), and then
placed the filled
bag into the pack. The peanuts are lightweight and malleable within, enabling me
to create a
shallow "well" in the top of the pack's lid that the treble-string
corner of the autoharp won't slip out of, thanks to the curved zipper.
(Everyone asks about using Styrofoam peanuts instead, but these will flatten in
a short time. Now, if you want to eat the peanuts, try dried navy beans instead!) If the autoharp needs to be higher or
lower, just add or remove the peanuts/beans, and adjust the belt if necessary. My
pack belt is loosely slung over the top of the pelvis (see the next question for
more specifics); the pack being positioned more toward the
left front of my pelvis when I'm standing. Plus, the belt prevents the
bottom of the autoharp from
pushing itself and the pack away from my body. The result is more than
neutral wrists: I now play with two free arms, both feet on the floor, a tension-free right side
of the body (the tension there came from playing cross-legged), and great
endurance for fast picking! I feel open and free. Note: If you need
some height, and a hip pouch raises the autoharp too much, try wrapping a hand
towel or whatever around an old necktie or a longer belt than what you would normally wear around
your waist. If you're tall and need more height than the pouch can offer,
fold up a towel and place it on your left thigh under the pouch (not the
autoharp).
Note: To use
the pouch well, your spine must first be balanced. This means the head balances atop a lengthened
neck/spine, and all of this in turn balances atop a neutral pelvis. Those
autoharpists who have reported that the fanny pack doesn't work for them play
with their torsos caved in (the spine is "hunched over", the head is
forward and the pelvis tilts up, aka, classic downward pull). The
resulting spine curve shifts the body's weight off the weight-bearing spine to
distort the torso's length, applying unnecessary pressure to the back.
Situated this way, these players make themselves too short in the torso to reap
the benefits the fanny pack would give them if their spines were lengthened and
balanced. You can find a hip pouch similar to
what's shown at right at www.cabelas.com.
Once there, copy and paste this catalog number in the Search field: 2UG-590895.
To see the pack in use while playing,
scroll down this page a little bit more for a still photo. You might also
enjoy, clicking here to see
a YouTube Video.
Right wrist
While both men and women are
capable of bending the right wrist into sustained flexion, men tend to flex it
more routinely because they lack "anterior
endowment." The solution for everyone is to simply open the humero-scapular
joint in the shoulder to lift the
right elbow up, out and forward. Yes, "stick your arm out like a
chicken wing"; your arms need this spaciousness for easy playing! (I don't anticipate the upward movement of a man's elbow to
necessitate a much higher autoharp, because the right elbow doesn't need to come
forward as much as it will for a woman.)
One of the other things that
causes sustained flexion in the wrists is using both forearms to stabilize the
autoharp while playing. Leaning the right
forearm on the autoharp means more than bending the wrist perpetually so that
the fingers can reach the strings; it also means anchoring the hand over one
section of the strings, limiting
the number of strings that can be reached comfortably. A fanny pack or
similar "prosthesis" will assist freeing both arms, as long as they
are off the autoharp, while neutralizing
both wrists.
Right-hand fingering (for diatonic autoharp; chromatic players, click
here!)
Right-hand fingering for most
diatonic autoharpists of the "pumping felt" persuasion comes down to two-finger playing, pinching exclusively with the
middle finger and thumb (m-t) and plucking with the index finger (i)
alone. Playing up a scale with the m-t/i pattern bends the hand sideways
from the arm (towards the floor when holding the autoharp upright), taking the
right wrist out of neutral into chronic ulnar deviation. Reason: The index finger has to
reach out beyond the index finger to reach the string, and the
easiest way to get it to do that is to perpetually bend the wrist sideways.
Now take a closer look at the right
hand: Hold your autoharp
up to play and hold your right hand over the strings in playing position with a
neutral wrist. Now look at your fingers. Of the index and ring
finger, which one is already poised to strike a higher string? Of course
you see it. It's the middle finger, because it's longer than the index
finger. When the pattern reverses to become i-t/m to play up a scale, the
wrist can maintain a neutral position, which in turn does great things for ease
of playing. Further, the player's expectation to use ring finger as well poises
the hand to encourage a neutral wrist.[36]
Does this mean that a middle-finger
pinch is never used? No. Right-hand fingering need to be as flexible
as melodies eternally are. (Piano fingering shows how varied the patterns
can be.) My basic rule of thumb (no pun intended) is to
let the index, middle and ring fingers follow the shape of the melody, instead
of pinching routinely with only one finger. But following the melody's shape
isn't hard and fast, either! If you would like to pick up some additional fingering
patterns that I personally find useful,
about teaching a workshop in your area.
(Chromatic
players, take note: Same-finger pinching will tire your hand, and has been
known to create pain for some players. Even though this thought has
nothing to do with the wrists, it still has to do with playing freely.)
Back to list of autoharp questions
What's the best placement of the hip pouch when
setting up to play?
Your answer to this question
depends on your body type and is therefore highly individualized. I'll
suggest a starting place; from there, you will need to experiment to find what
works best for you.
First, note the three points of
autoharp contact when held upright against the chest:
- a well in the lid of the hip pouch;
- a large area running from the left collarbone to the fullest part of the
bust (women, take note); and
- the left side of the jaw.
All three contact points allow the
autoharp to remain secure against the body without the need for arm support
while playing.
About that second, very large contact
area: Women especially need the autoharp to slant so that the autoharp's
back can rest flat against
the upper bust. Herein lay a clue about hip pouch placement: The more
slant needed to accommodate bustline, the further away the pouch needs to be from the body.
To set up the pouch (men and women):
- Fasten the pouch belt around the widest part of your hips. (This is
just a
point of measure.)
- Raise the belt to go across the small of your back. Should the pouch "sag" quite a bit in front of
you, this is fine.
- Now sit on the front half of an armless chair with a firm seat >>so
that your lap can be level with the floor<<. Do not sit on a
couch with cushions, as this can throw off the autoharp's eventual
relativity to the arms. A dining room or kitchen chair works for
most. If you are short and don't have access to a shorter chair, put a
thick phone book under each foot to level your lap. Tall players might
put stacks of books or magazines under each chair leg to achieve a level lap
(or sit on a piano bench, whose seat is higher than regular chairs).
- Center the pouch on your left thigh (do not center it over the crotch;
this is too far to your right for what's coming up). You may notice a
large gap between the pouch and you. This is also fine.
- Set up the autoharp:
1. Center the treble corner of the autoharp on the pouch lid;
2. rest the autoharp on
your collarbone/upper chest; and
3. gently rest the autoharp against the left side of your jaw (without also
resting on your ear).
If
you can catch a side view of yourself in a mirror at this point, you should
see the autoharp slanting towards your shoulder; it will not be dead
vertical (you don’t want dead vertical, anyway; it’ll fall over!).
- Open up the joints in both shoulders (upper arms extending out some from
the sides your body; see this photo for
approximate opening).
Feel very spacious!
- Play. How does this feel?
- If the autoharp prefers to lean on
your left arm, you can help it rest on your jaw by making adjustments in the
pouch's location on your thigh, shifting the pouch well and treble corner a
tad to your left, loosening/tightening the pouch belt, or adjusting the size
of the well by moving peanuts around. (If you loosen the belt, it may
be necessary to also stick a folded hand towel or similar between
your thigh and the pouch to raise the autoharp.)
For me, set-up is done, but because your "girth" is going to be
different from mine, further adjustments may be necessary. Continue below if you need to:
- Lengthen the belt some (an inch, 2 inches; play around with this; one of
my very slender autoharp students let her belt out 4 inches), then set up and play again. A look
in the mirror from the side will help you see if your autoharp matches
upper-chest slant. (You may want to hold on to the belt when walking around lest the pouch wind up
down around your ankles!)
Need a longer belt? Thread a length of rope or twine, even an old
necktie, through the "loop" on each end of the belt, then tie the
ends together with an overhand knot. It is important that this knot be
able to hold securely, so check it should the material be slippery (an
overhand knot should do the trick).
Make the extension loop large enough, but not too large, so that you can
continue to make adjustments with the sliders on the belt.
- Need more or less slant to match your upper body? Adjust the pouch's belt length
again.
Remember, the autoharp needs to
lean on you with the same slant as the upper front of the body, which means that it
will rest on a large area from the collarbone to the the fullest part of the bust/chest. A
plus upon finding the right slant is that you will be able to see the strings
in your peripheral vision. Slant may also make strumming and picking all the strings
easier.
Back to list of autoharp questions
I've been taught to strum by not pushing my thumb across the strings
with my arm. What do you have to say about this?
I've heard this, too, and you
should know that it's the lack of movement when playing the autoharp that
hurts autoharpists. (For a YouTube video showing autoharping movement, click
here.) We need to engage our larger joints to play safely--and
musically!
But, now for a little perspective, because this instruction strikes me as
needing some more careful observation.
I believe that those who talk
about not pushing the pick with the arm are referring to not pushing with the entire
arm. However, because what to do remains up to interpretation, autoharpists
then conclude that the arm isn't used at all, and consequently strum and brush only from the wrist or thumb,
flexing one or the other exclusively. You'll cause some discomfort, maybe
even pain,
strumming with just your wrist or thumb, while denying yourself the pleasure of
fully resonant sound.
Strumming in all its forms takes
quite the vocabulary of subtle and assertive movements, depending on the strum's
function and the effect you want from it. When you strum the autoharp like a guitar
to accompany your singing or to back up melody instruments in a jam session, most of the movement
comes from the forearm going up and down, as a result of bending the
elbow. The whole arm is not needed here, but part of it is quite
useful, as you can see in the thankfully "fuzzy" photo at right, where
I'm strumming away during one of my solos in a concert. Notice the range
covered by both the forearm and the hand. My elbow and upper arm look
quieter, but they are not static. That's because my body is also moving
while I play. When strumming with the forearm, my wrist is free enough to respond naturally
to the forearm movement, and my thumb's sole function is to support the
pick. Neither thumb nor wrist forcibly flex to create playing
action. They don't have to, because my forearm does the
strumming.
However, now look at strumming just the high strings.
The elbow must open more so the entire arm can center the hand over the
high strings. Once the hand is placed, forearm strumming resumes. So you
see, the entire arm cannot remain static; it's a dynamic structure in need of
constant engagement and readjustment (this goes for picking strings, too).
This is why I recommend playing the autoharp with the forearm off
the autoharp; a 1/4 inch away is all it takes. When you want to change
ranges, make big jumps, etc., an arm free from anchoring the autoharp lets the elbow open so
the hand can move to where it needs to go. So, for accompaniment strumming, the
instruction you've received is correct: You don't want to strum by pushing the
pick over the strings with your entire arm. That would tire you quickly,
and might become painful in time. But you still need your entire arm to head
your hand toward the strings you want to strum.
Whole-arm strumming isn't entirely
a bad thing, either, and therefore shouldn't be discounted; in fact, it does
wondrous things. First of all, how else are you going to take the pick
across all the strings when you want to zing the ending of your
most fabulous piece?! You can't do it with just the thumb, wrist or
forearm. However, whole-arm strumming--or brushing, as it usually
turns out to be--is occasional, often used to fill in the "silent"
beats within long note values to keep the beat going (such as pinch-brush to
play a half note, and pinch-brush-brush-brush to play a whole note). I
often brush by using my entire arm, and it feels good. If I brushed with
only my thumb or wrist, I wouldn't get the quality of sound that allows the
music to breathe, and I might eventually inflict myself with a lot of pain.
So, whether strumming to accompany or brushing lush chords for filler, the thumb takes an inactive
role, and the wrist responds to the arm movement, rather than either one
initiating movement. If you compare the sound of one strum each by the thumb, wrist,
forearm and whole arm, I am confident that you will also hear a distinct
difference in volume and resonance that will help you choose the kind of sound
you want at any given time to always sound your best.
And here is a side note: Whenever you
see "T" (for the thumb) in music notation, remember that this symbol
indicates the digit that strikes the strings, rather than an instruction to move
only the thumb to sound them!
In conclusion, the more your
entire body is involved in playing, the freer it is to move (remember: when we
can't move, we can't play), and the rounder the autoharp's sound becomes.
Back to list of autoharp questions
Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008 Lucille Reilly. All rights reserved.
No portion of the contents on this page may be reproduced for mass production
without permission of the author;
however, links to this page from other web sites are welcomed and encouraged.
1.
Comparison of hammer holds and their
effects on tone quality. (Reilly,
November 1985)
2.
Sound comparison of striking a
course with a neutral hammer hold and forearm strike to a thumb-extended hold
and wrist strike: The oscillating waves shown in the curve of the neutral hold displays
are smooth, while the
wave of the thumb-extended hold is jagged. The
tune "Petronella" was also played with both hammer holds/strike
types. (Reilly, January 2005)
3.
“The Forearm Tower,” a method to quickly find neutral hammer hold from a vertical forearm.
Both students and non-playing subjects participated in this study. Once the thumb
was neutrally placed, the author asked subjects to slowly slide the thumb tip
toward the tip of the index finger to replicate a commonly used, injury-prone
hammer hold. Subjects
experienced muscle discomfort anywhere from the wrist to the shoulder.
(Reilly, March 2005)
4.
Applying and withholding core
movement in music making: The author and her students explore playing the
dulcimer both with and without leaning, turning, shifting and panning over it.
Pain in the neck/shoulders area ensues when playing without core
movement. (Reilly, November 2005 to
present)
5.
Wrist
and arm hammering and their effects on tempo. The author played the
tune "Cincinnati" and used a metronome to determine the fastest
threshold tempo (where the tune loses steadiness of strikes within metronome
beats) when playing with "rough" wrists (torquing the forearms with
almost undetectable stopping after each hand strikes), "smooth"
wrists (continuous, equal exchange of up and down wrist movement) and bending
the elbows. Thresholds were as followed, based on four eighth notes to one
metronome beat: rough wristing=108 (note: dance tempo of reels ranges from about
100 to 120, making most of this range feel uncomfortable); smooth wristing=132; elbow bending=152. (Reilly, August 2005)
6.
Determining any player’s rest
distance between a central strike point on the dulcimer and the hammer’s
strike surface prior to playing (the rest distance does not establish a boundary
for hammer height when playing; rather, it ensures that there is enough strike
space underneath the strike surface of the mallet for free movement in playing to take
place): The author developed quotients that can be multiplied to the
measurement from the Olecrenon process to the strike surface of the hammer to
determine a rest distance for players of any height or arm length within the
free-angle degree range. Thus
far, several dulcimer players have been successfully “angled”, releasing
them to hammer more freely and easily. (Reilly,
April 2006 to present)
7.
Playing a RL Tack Lightweight 15-15 dulcimer
(built in 2003) tilted in five-degree increments from -5 to 40
degrees to determine angle range of the most free and kinesthetically pleasing
hammering while standing to play. Striking the strings was performed
by bending at the elbow joints and using a neutral
hammer hold. Once a free-angle
range for standing was determined, angles for sitting were
identified. Five-note scales for each key starting to the right of the
treble bridge were played and examined for body/dulcimer relationships and
thumb/wrist positions, followed by five tunes which collectively cover the full
range of a 15-15 dulcimer. While playing
angles have become steeper in recent years, 16 degrees and up (when standing to
play) demonstrates concern, limiting core movement, creating pain around the biceps area of
the upper arms (appearing after only ten seconds of playing when the dulcimer
was tilted 30 degrees and greater), shifting neutral thumbs
automatically into chronic hyperlaxity when playing in the dulcimer's lower keys (usually D and A
major), chronic radial deviation when playing in D and A major, and a sensation of choking when playing at 40
degrees (indicating the onset of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome [26]).
Angles of 7 degrees and less brought about similar physical responses, although
invoking ulnar rather than radial deviation. Optimum sitting angles are
steeper, 20-25 degrees. (Reilly,
June 2006)
8.
Playing "Petronella" with mostly alternating strokes and a strong-hand
lead to explore the body's changing kinesthesia. Alternating strokes:
Alternating through this duple-meter tune's very prevalent 8--16-16 rhythm
(R--L-R L--R-L) encourages both hands to stop moving after each eighth
note; continuous motion can be achieved, but only with much thought. The
body feels out of synch with itself in attempting to move with the music, and so
settles into a lack of body movement for comfort. The overall sound of the
tune is "flat," as dynamic range cannot be accessed. It is also impossible to smile while
playing. Strong-hand lead: Allows continuous
follow-though in the spaces of the 8--16-16 rhythm (R--R-L R--R-L). When
follow-through is engaged, core body movement flows with the arms and hands in
agreement with the music-making. All elements combined "shade" the
rhythm to help the phrasing and dance-ability. A body in agreement with
itself frees the muscles, enabling smiling. (Reilly, August 2005-May
2006)
9.
While performing the tests in #8 above, the author videotaped the same musical sequence
several times. At 30, 35 and 40 degrees, she experienced difficulty
discerning treble from bass strings because of the strings' parallel appearance given by these angles. (Reilly, June 2006)
10.
Conable, Barbara, What
Every Musician Needs to Know about the Body,
page 22.
11.
Ibid., pp.
44-49.
12.
Conable, Barbara, and William Conable, How
to Learn the Alexander Technique, pp.
3-15.
13.
Krames Corporation leaflet #1410, Preventing Repetitive Strain among Grocery Store
Employees, page 4.
14.
Pascarelli, Emil, Dr. Pascarelli's Complete Guide to Repetitive Strain
Injury, pp. 154-155.
15.
Conable, Barbara, What
Every Musician Needs to Know about the Body,
page 62.
16.
Mark, Thomas, What Every Pianist Needs to Know about the
Body, GIA
Publications, 2003, page 105.
17.
Email discussion with an Andover Educator who is both a musician and physical
therapist, November, 2005.
18.
Pascarelli, Emil, Dr. Pascarelli's Complete Guide to Repetitive Strain
Injury, page 153.
19.
Ibid., chapter 5.
20.
Reilly, Lucille, Striking Out and
Winning! A music-maker's guide to the hammered dulcimer (2nd ed., 1992),
page 18.
21.
Pascarelli, Emil, Dr. Pascarelli's Complete Guide to Repetitive Strain
Injury, page 3.
22.
Conable, Barbara, and William Conable, How
to Learn the Alexander Technique, pp.
35-38.
23.
Reilly, Lucille, Striking Out and
Winning! A music-maker's guide to the hammered dulcimer (2nd ed., 1992),
page 2 and 15.
24.
Ibid., page 17 (bottom).
25.
Ibid., chapters 3 and 4.
26.
Pascarelli, Emil, Dr. Pascarelli's Complete Guide to Repetitive Strain
Injury, pp. 46-49.
27.
Reilly, Lucille, Striking Out and
Winning! A music-maker's guide to the hammered dulcimer (2nd ed., 1992),
A Challenge, page 35.
28.
Conable, Barbara, What
Every Musician Needs to Know about the Body,
page 34, and notes from "Introduction to Alexander Technique and Body
Mapping" taught by Barbara Conable at Westminster Choir College, June 2005.
29. Ibid., pp. 44-46.
30.
Ibid., page 69.
31.
Reilly, Lucille,
Striking Out and
Winning! A music-maker's guide to the hammered dulcimer (2nd ed., 1992),
A Challenge, pp. 60-72, 75-78.
32.
Conable, Barbara, What
Every Musician Needs to Know about the Body,
page 43.
33.
Pascarelli, Emil,
Dr. Pascarelli's Complete Guide to Repetitive Strain
Injury, page 158.
34.
Conable, Barbara, What
Every Musician Needs to Know about the Body,
pp. 42-43, 50-63.
35.
Lecture notes from a class taught by Barbara Conable in Alexander Technique and
Body Mapping, Westminster Choir College, Princeton, NJ, June 2005.
36.
Reilly, Lucille, #2: The
Flowers of Edinburgh, Shadrach Productions, 1998/2006, page 17.
About Lucille Reilly
The Music Events Schedule
Teaching
FAQs Thoughts of Note
The Marketplace Music Transcriptions
Join the Mailing List Links & More Contact
Home
|